Commentary

Starved For News: People In News Deserts Largely Rely On Non-Journalistic Sources

People who live in news deserts are finding their own ways to gain information — through social media feeds, influencers and family and friends, according to a new study by the Medill Local Initiative at Northwestern University.

Indeed, of those who follow the news daily in local news deserts, 51% get it from non-journalistic (i.e., non-professional) sources. And many don’t even think they are missing anything. Here is a listing of their sources, including legacy channels: 

Social media groups or pages — 42%

Local TV stations — 41% 

Search engines — 35% 

Friends and family — 33% 

Social media influencers — 30% 

Local radio stations or local news podcasts — 25%

advertisement

advertisement

Digital-only local news websites — 23% 

The only products in the top five are local TV stations. 

Perhaps because of the dearth of coverage, 46% of news desert readers trust local news. But that is far outpaced by the 59% who live in areas with news coverage. 

Here’s the problem.  

“You might feel like you’re part of a close-knit community that knows what’s going on, but places with a lack of journalism are missing an external source of information and a system of accountability of people in power,” said Zach Metzger, director of the Medill State of Local News Project, who led the survey for Medill. “The danger is what happens when they rely on social media because they have lost the journalistic view of things they are no longer able to see in their daily lives.” 

Only 15% of those who live in news deserts subscribe or donate to a newspaper, versus 33% of individuals in news-abundant areas. 

Similarly, 22% of people in news-abundant locales have spoken with or been interviewed by a journalist in the past five years, compared to 9% in news deserts. 

And, only 20% of individuals in news-deprived areas have taken action on a community issue based on a news story. But 34% have done so in areas with adequate news coverage. 

The U.S. has lost roughly 3,500 newspapers in the past 20 years. There are 212 news desert counties, mostly in rural areas, the study states.  

This study was conducted from July 22nd to August 8th, 2025. Working on behalf of Medill, Qualtrics surveyed 1,000 individuals, half in news deserts and half from counties with abundant news sources.

Here is a link to the study report.

1 comment about "Starved For News: People In News Deserts Largely Rely On Non-Journalistic Sources".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Gordon Borrell from Borrell Associates, February 13, 2026 at 8:02 a.m.

    While interesting, studies on so-called news deserts seem a bit print-biased and negate the fact that what qualifies as "news" in very small markets isn't really "journalism."  Like someone's son achieving Eagle Scout, the high school football team winning the regional title.  Sometimes that's really all the news that happens in a town of 4,000.  When the last printed newspaper in a county shuts down, Northwestern and other schools declare it a news desert despite the fact that local radio stations still exist and that many of them have viable news operations with journalists. Quite a few even have news-only websites unbranded to the stations. In fact, the article cited in the Northwestern study talks about Dunn County, ND, as a news desert and never mentions https://www.newsdakota.com/category/news/, a standalone website with real journalists covering news throughout the region. In Nebraska, a dozen counties listed are considered news deserts, yet the Rural Radio Network https://ruralradio.com/rrn/ covers local and regional news for all of them.... again, with real journalists. These sites are not only popular (if thousands of Facebook followers are an indication), but also something that weekly newspapers are typically not: profitable.

Next story loading loading..